Monday, December 11, 2017

For Your Liberal Friends. They won't understand.


FROM ME TO YOUR LIBERAL FRIENDS.
It's an American thing, you wouldn't understand. A man, who parlayed a million dollars into a billion dollars through real estate, has an internal obligation if he's an American. This obligation burns inside you until it grows into a calling you know you'd best not ignore, because as a Christian American, you know that "calling" is a gift that must be accepted. A calling equals responsibility. You know this because you were taught that God goes with country, if...you're an American.
When you're an American you come from stock that was willing to dismiss Monarchs and shed blood at the drop of a hat over words like, liberty, or freedom. Bully's weren't something that you preached against, they were an opportunity to show your mustard.
American children grow up understanding the meaning of sacrifice and delayed gratification. They understand there's a hierarchy to just about everything, as well as a path to the top. American children also know that the opportunity to reach the top was given to them because of that before mentioned word, sacrifice. That too is an American thing. You wouldn't understand.
So yea, it's an American thing when a billionaire descends an escalator with his bride, and leaves his empire to work for free out of a sense of deep concern for his country. 
I understand, that's hard for you to understand.
Trump was never far from the people who worked for him. He was as personable and interested in the man operating the crane on his new high rise as the cook in the kitchen preparing meals for guests. He rubbed elbows with other billionaires, as well as working men and women.
We stopped caring what Europe thought of us in 1776. From the time the train left the station it has made no stops, and has only gained momentum. The UniParty establishment and it's propaganda arm (The MSM) can not thwart nor deter destiny. Our true potential has yet to be tapped, and yet here we are, the greatest country on the planet, at the precipice of the kind of greatness never before seen. That's an American thing you're about to understand.

Monday, October 2, 2017

Are BULLY'S really a bad thing?

Who's idea was it to eliminate the great American bully? 

Bully's are a good thing. 



Has anyone ever really questioned the idea of "no bully zones?" Has anyone ever suggested that maybe the bully is an important part of human development?  I know, I know, "kids are cruel."  So what?  Not everything life presents you with is going to be fair.  Today when I hear someone say, "time to put your big boy pants on," I think, really?  There's a time for big boy pants anymore?   Ya fuckin' kidding me?  

Today we have safe rooms.  No really.  There's such a thing called a safe room.  No.  It's not where you go during a terrorist attack, it's a room for... get this... 18 to 22 year olds to run to on college campus when their feelings get hurt, which brings me back to the bully.  Anyone here remember when you were a kid, and you got bullied?  Whether it be on the bus or in school?  Did you stand up to the bully?  I did.  I kicked a bully's ass in High School and earned a three day suspension.  I also had one kick my ass at summer camp.  Then there was the ass whooping I talked myself out of. Sometimes I got in fights defending my little brother, whom I bullied when he wouldn't shut the fuck up.  In all of these instances, I didn't die.  In fact, learning to stand up to a bully gave me self confidence.  Self respect.  It's one thing to say you have self respect, but it's a whole other thing to actually demonstrate it to yourself by your actions.  

How about sticking up for others who are being bullied?  These people are being groomed to become great cops, or perhaps work in some other branch of law enforcement?  Perhaps become lawyers or prosecuting attorneys?  

What have we replaced with the elimination of the bully?  Well newsflash for you.  The bully still exists.  They sit behind their laptops on twitter in mommies basement, and or have graduated to becoming highly skilled at passive aggression, torturing their victims in a whole other way.  But I digress.  What have we replaced with the bully?  Eunuchs.  Yes.  Neutered males.  It's really quite disgusting.  Seriously people, if given the choice what would ultimately choose, knowing what you know now?  A life with bully's or a life filled with neutered males?  Today, if a girl wants a guy that's got an edge to him, she has to go to the bottom of the barrel in order to find a pair of balls.  Good luck with the breeding outcome there.  And so, I suppose that's our lot in life. 

So now we have an entire generation of effeminate males running around growing facial hair and beards because otherwise we wouldn't recognize them as males if it weren't for the facial hair.  ( OK - I'm a little jealous I can't grow a beard.  I look like shaggy from Scooby Doo when I try it - but that's not the point!)  The point is what's wrong with "co-existing" with bully's?  Why do we feel the need to protect everybody from everybody?  Who thought that was a good idea?  Oh wait... liberals.  

Read Alinky's "Rules for Radicals" for more on that subject. 

Today bullying still exists.  It exists in virtual reality.  Kids torturing one another on social media and or by means of ostracizing. What doesn't exist?  

What doesn't exist?  The ability to confront it head on? The ability to hash it out, because the bully has brought it to a head?  The opportunity to face a problem head on rather than confront it?  What are the ramifications of eliminating the bully?  I would argue, an attempted mass extinction of real men.  Men like Donald Trump.  Alpha males.  Leaders.  Yes, some of those bullies grew up to be your boss.  If you never figured out how to deal with them, no safe room is going to protect you.  Let's not forget to mention, how can we have the "revenge of the nerds" when there's nothing to avenge?  I count myself extremely lucky that three out of my four daughters have found really great men. 
  

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Obama rewrites the Declaration of Independence



If you have a television set, then I'm sure you heard that Obama was in Vietnam. Were you aware however, that while in Ho Chi Minh City, (what used to be called Saigon), Obama gave a speech where he rewrote the Declaration of Independence? You heard me right. He rewrote the Declaration of Independence. Obama said in his speech to the Vietnamese, quoting the Declaration of Independence, "...we have a really good story, it's called the Declaration of Independence. We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal. That we're endowed with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Mr. Obama. That's not what it says.
Mr. Obama, the Declaration of Independence was written by men who knew that by signing that very document, they were committing a hanging offense. You couldn't carry their water intellectually, spiritually or even physically. They knew that when they penned that very document that they could be hanged. These were men with everything to loose. Land, property, family their very life. Having said that, when they wrote it they included something you left out. The Declaration of Independence actually reads, "We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal. That they are endowed BY THEIR CREATOR, with certain unalienable rights..." Endowed by their creator.
What? Am I going to go off on some religious rant now? I don't know. What do I detest more? The radical far right religious zealots and biblical hypocrites, or the secular far left wing pseudo heady intellectual swine of the democratic party? Both of whom are a pox upon us. The founders called this. They warned this would happen and they were clear that liberty was the glue which held the bricks of logic together in the face of these two despondency's. On one hand you have the Obama scourge who try to re-write and abolish the Constitution, while on the other hand you have the far right who use its very words in so called "literal translation" like a bible thumping zealot to draw their conclusions for you. Conclusions you must accept via fallacy type reasoning - "if this then that." So who do I detest more? Hands down, it has to be the democrats. The democrats are actually worse than the zealots. To be a democrat you're not only ignorant beyond compare, but you're minus a soul. Everything about the left goes contrary to the soul. The left is a disease, creating far greater damage to the Republic, to such an extent that it easily defeats the zealots every time, thus removing God from everything. Their secular goals and pinning's evident in legislation, policy, judiciary and congressional over reach for the past 50 years. Slinging precedence against jurisprudence to eradicate those who give freely from the equation. The Church. The faithful. Be gone. The government will take it from here. They easily stab and break down the argument from the far right zealots, because hypocrisy is always found apparent, and we all abhor hypocrisy because we're all hypocrites.
In reality it's only confusing if you're one of these two types of idiots. When you listen to them go after one another it's literally like watching Abbot and Costello. This is yet another reason I've enjoyed watching Donald tear them both down. Down to the ground. As a political junky, this has been the best of both worlds. Not only taking down the establishment, but pulling the zealots out of the party. Kicking them to the curb so we no longer take their blows when the left asks... "Hey Zeolot! Got two tens for a five?"

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Zuckerberg Marriage to the Uni-party Agenda and Facebook Censorship

Lately I've noticed commentary, (borderline narrative at this point) but consistent commentary from certain News outlets on this subject. Last night for example on Fox, Greg Gutfeld and friends stated that Facebook is strictly for "people to look up old high school boyfriends and girlfriends and see what they're up to." Gutfeld and friends said this on one of their comfy couches with a panel that consisted of a liberal (whom I could actually smell decaying through my television set) along with a kinda wanna be Hipster Conservative, and a couple of "info babes."  Somehow the use of Facebook as a tool for free speech, "is not what Facebook should really be all about." "It's not a political forum, it's for grandma to look at pictures of the grand kids." Is this yet another tell tale sign that Facebook and the propaganda media are in cahoots? Hmmm...


Yet for many, including myself, Facebook has obviously evolved into more. (To the chagrin of some) Facebook is however, convenient for sharing ideas and substantive thought. I will occasionally blog, but I stay on top of politics through a web of blogs and news sources, and then I sort it out on Facebook. The result? My view, for whatever it's worth, but it's my view of what I think is going on, and it usually has my opinion right along with it. Occasionally I get feedback back from some of you who enjoy my Facebook posts. (Some of you enjoy with me while others enjoy at me - two welcome camps none the less). 😜

To marginalize the connectivity by minimizing the impact of Facebook is in and of itself a slap in the face of free speech. To filter speech in an attempt to marry an already complicit media and government propaganda machine to a forum whereby folks like myself go to for sorting it, is nothing short of treason. Mark Zuckerberg is a quintessential self entitled spoiled little child with a whole lot of money and power. If he censors free thought, conservative or otherwise then he'll quickly open a door to the demise of Facebook. Networks and news "organizations" struggle to pay the bills. In order for them to survive they realize they must somehow interject a perceived modicum of opposing views. But with a globalist agenda on BOTH the left and right, the people have drawn a line and said no more. It has become the basis for a movement in stark contrast to the globalist agenda. The people made Trump. That's what the media doesn't get. The times made the man. He is the chosen vessel. The Trump Movement.

The real enemy isn't left or right, it's a unified front with a globalist agenda. An attempt to inject immigrants, un-vetted military age Muslims and "refugees" into our divisive and angry state of affairs, perpetuated by the same inter-related media and it's governing uni-party and agenda driven establishment. Just as they've done in Europe. Just as they continue to do now. The Trump movement is a push back against everything they've done the past 40 years here in America and overseas. It's a strange kind of Machiavellian George Soros / Hillary / Jeb / Saudi kinda world, and it's time. Time to make America Great Again.




Thursday, April 7, 2016

Donald Trump and the Battle of Bunker Hill

Donald Trump and the Battle of Bunker Hill. 


That evening when the Red Coats pulled into Boston Harbor, they dropped anchor in front of Bunker Hill. Capturing Bunker Hill would give the British total control of Boston Harbor. General Howe told his men to rest up that evening, "we'll strike in the morning" he said. While the General and his men slept in the harbor, the militia got to work.  General Howe woke to a six foot high dirt wall at the top of Bunker Hill.  He was reported to have said, "those colonists have done more work in one evening than my men have done in a month."  ( what a morale builder that guy was )

Not amused by the massive wall, (this one not paid for by Mexico) General Howe ordered cannon fire to destroy it, but to no avail. General Howe then ordered his men to take Bunker Hill.  As the Red Coats advanced up the Hill carrying their heavy muskets, they were easy targets for the militia. The militia were ordered, "don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes!"  No sooner did the first wave of Red Coats take to the hill, did their dead bodies descend it, followed by retreat of their countrymen. The Colonists won the first attack. The General ordered his men back up the hill, and wave after wave they were mowed down by musket fire.  Eventually, the Red Coats did take Bunker Hill, but with Yuge losses. The body count was so disproportionate that the battle actually emboldened the Colonists rather than defeated their spirit.  That is Donald J. Trump in Wisconsin.

The first wave up the Hill in Wisconsin were the media zealots.  Taking aim with "Grabgate."  A pathetic attempt at tying two false narratives together, using a tart named "Fields."  Grabgate tied the false narratives that;

  1. Trump's campaign nurtured a culture of violence
  2. Trump will not back down even when he's wrong
In order to answer the first wave up the Hill, musket fire took the form of common sense.  Trump never invited paid protesters to his rallies, (only Soros did) and secondly he's admitted to being wrong in the past, when he switched from Democrat to Republican.  Soon the cries for retreat were heard, but the establishment ordered the second wave up the Hill.  

The 2nd wave was met with the same visceral admonishment.  Megyn Kelly, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Charles Krauthammer all continued to pound away with cannon fire as their troops repeatedly were met with fatality after fatality. Kelly pleading her case to the networks how she's been harmed as a woman, as Trump answers a hypothetical question from Chris Matthews.  

Matthews:  "Mr. Trump, if there is a hypothetical law and that law is broken, should the hypothetical person who broke that hypothetical law be punished?"  

Trump:  "Yes."  

Charge!  Now the third wave ascends the Hill in week two of Wisconsin!  Now it's time to charge with the already in place corrupt political machine of Governor Scott Walker.  This wave falls but begins to take ground.  The establishment sends in wave after wave of Red Coats.  Climbing over the dead they continue to ascend and descend, ascend and descend to the smell of blood and gun powder. Muskets are so hot, they're burning the hands of the patriots yet they still fight on.  Wave after wave, talk radio, television media, print, cable, satellite, super pacs into the combined billions til finally they crest the Hill!  The disproportionate body count in terms of money spent?  When the smoke clears the atrocity is visible, for having had lost Wisconsin, the Patriots had found an even greater belief in victory at hand.  What the establishment hoard is willing to spend to maintain power over the people is nothing less than astonishing.

Once the smoke had finally cleared, lyin' Ted CRUZe was still left needing 733 of the remaining 769 delegates.  The papers back in Great Britain would spin the story as a Yuge Red Coat victory for his majesty the Establishment, but the Patriots know better.  Despite the loss, many of the generals opposing the Patriots, were heard murmuring in back halls, "that Trump still had nearly 40% of the vote. His base was stronger than ever and it was growing.  Bottom line is this. We're in New York now baby.  Take the FU train to Flatbush lyin' Ted.  We're crossing the Delaware soon.  Real soon.


Sunday, March 27, 2016

Coffee with the Global Elite

...an interview in retrospect, with one of the global elites. 

He slowly sips his coffee, balancing a cigarette in kind. His eyes greet me with utter disdain, yet he has something he is compelled to get off of his chest.  He's simply had enough of the circus, and if he could control time as he and his friends have controlled entire nation states, he would cast 2016 into the 17th century. Another piece of scrap onto the dung heap of history.  During our interview I spot him occasionally glance at a bank of televisions on the wall behind me.  Each of the dozen or so flat screens behind me, displays a different media source from around the globe.  Apparently he's amused at something on one of them, because every once in a while he smiles like he knows another dirty little secret.  Not too many secrets these days, thanks to Donald Trump and his "loud mouthed vulgarian minions." Indeed, in some circles they're calling the Trump campaign the "reality tour," or the "revelation campaign."  In either event, our friend the globalist is not amused, although something has caught his attention behind me. I glance over my right shoulder to see what it is, and apparently it's yet another terrorist attack. But of-course. 

The man about to speak is one of the global elites.  He wants to go on record.  So I let him.

"Americans accuse us of being...what's the word?  Arrogant.  There's nothing more arrogant than an American.  Constantly chanting USA every time one of their offspring hits a ball or crosses a finish line. Quite frankly I find it ironic and nauseating all at the same time.  The flag you pledge to today is our flag now. A mere symbol of what we perpetuate. It has been that way for decades. We, whom you call "elitists," only allow you to hold onto your flags false narrative and the warm fuzzy it gives you, every time the military we own does a flyby at one of your sporting events.  We own the military because we own the government that deploys them. We create the evil for you to dispel and in turn we create more power for ourselves. We do this militarily as well as economically. Who you vote for, has been dictated by us for decades. Your man Trump is right about one thing though, and that is for as often as you Americans chant USA in victory, you're losing at every turn with us. With us he's right, you don't win anymore. We win.  You lose." 

"You have no idea what it takes, to harness the power of the people on this planet, not only militarily and financially but socially and fundamentally.  Do you really think we're going to let a non-conformist like Trump threaten that?  You're delusional. Trump is a Nationalist. We can not have a Nationalist non-conformist thwart everything we've accomplished over the past three decades. Besides, the man is a lose cannon. We can't afford a lose cannon."  

"From Bush to Obama, we have painstakingly shifted power and money away from the U.S. Follow the multiplicative trail - NAFTA, TPP, The Columbia Trade Agreement, the Panama Free Trade agreement, Korea... I could go on." 

"We have actually placed legal tariffs on the United States in many cases, in order to shift the imbalance out of your favor. Take China for example. When you devalue a currency by 35%, you're basically placing a tariff on the opposing country with whom they trade without actually imposing a real tariff, and yet you sit and take it because that's what you American's do.  You take it.  You take what we give you. A Nationalist like Trump would never allow this to occur, and so yes, up until now, you've elected whom we've told you to elect.  Up until now you've played by our rules without too much discourse, and that's because the left wing and the right wing belong to the same bird in American politics.  Up until Trump you American's really never balked at our arrangement. Be that as it may, there's nothing you can do about it.  We own you. We own the planet.  The divisive nature of what we do is visible all around the globe, and you'd best know your role, as we can shift the blame anywhere, and anytime we like. We already have. Have you checked out your own global approval rating lately?"

"Up until now you've played by our rules without too much discourse, and that's because the left wing and the right wing belong to the same bird in American politics."

"Since we're all being open and honest with one another these days, can we just talk openly about your man Trump?  Your man will not conform. He's not interested in money or power, as we've thrown it at his feet only to watch him disregard it.  Such an ego to go up against us, and yet many of your fellow Americans chide him for having an ego!  <he laughs> You can't do anything with a guy like that.  Given every opportunity to conform the fool declines. During the first debate, we had the moderator ask if there was anyone who would not pledge allegiance to the Republican party should they not receive the nomination. He's the only one who raised his hand.  In this election it's a globalist or bust when it comes to our agenda. Granted, in reality the question was "will you tow the line" and "get in your place" and "do as you're told?"  Instead, the arrogant fool raised his hand and said he would not play by our rules.  We had no choice but to go after him from that day forward, and go after him with both wings of the bird, politically speaking."  

"Trump refuses to tow the line and now, it seems that there is somewhat of an uprising in support of this man, but let me tell you, that the reality of this uprising is this, the American people don't have the stomach to continue to go up against our machine. When Trump moves his Bishop to block our Queen, we move our Knight to threaten his Bishop. We use his momentum as a means in which to cause further divisiveness in the American people. That which makes him powerful we use to make him weak. Admittedly he's done the same, but the American people will bend at the knee, at the pace in which this back and forth escalates. They don't have the stomach for this election.  They'll throw Trump under the bus like Judas to Jesus. Take Trumps Nationalist rants about border and security for example, they have now become rants of racism and anti-immigrant rhetoric, rather than anti-illegal immigration. Why?  Because the media we own spins it that way. If he wins the popular vote we'll steal it from him anyway.  What are you going to do about it?  I'll tell you what you're going to do about it.  You're going to eat it like a great big helping of Obamacare dessert and like it, otherwise you'll be left attacking one another while we watch from afar. Either way we win and you lose."  

At this point in the interview, I'm imagining myself punching this guy in the face, but I allow him to continue his rant. 



"We're willing to let this go as far down the rabbit hole as necessary.  We're willing to let this get to a fevered pitch!  We here in the global elite camp, will ramp up the divisive narrative until American's, in order to stop the discourse, will cave and do as they're told!  We are the architects!  The American people have no idea what is at stake here. This is far bigger than Mr. Trump!  At a minimum, anyone voting for one of our other candidates is certainly clueless. This election is pivotal in our quest for a global initiative whereby we harness a more permanent power structure, one which the likes of the world has ever seen. It will make the Roman Empire look like the conquest of antiquity."

"You see we're all accountable to someone, in order for it to work it must be that way.  You people are the only ones complaining about it!  Well... with the EU in disarray as a result of our immigration policy, I guess you're not completely alone.  <he laughs again> As a people you Americans are still better off than 80% of the worlds population and yet you complain! What you don't understand is that if you continued as some sort of a favorite child, there would only be so much wealth and power we could garner from you and only you.  We had to expand the base of power, and in order to do so we have had to weaken you.  When you think about it, we're more moral than you in that regard, whereas you want to think about yourselves, and then cry foul when we look out for larger global interests.  Globalism is not about free trade, it’s about a ruling global elite brokering deals on trade boards owned by big banks, that set up unfair deals all over the world to get nation states to go into debt, and in so doing transfer all the wealth to the globalist combines. Rinse and repeat.  It’s a world wide siphoning of power and money – but mostly power.  I'm sure your "vulgarian" Mr. Trump would tell you, that in any good contract, the money takes care of itself if the power of that agreement is brokered to favor your end of the deal."  

"We built India's infrastructure in a matter of mere decades.  Don't think that because you have a complex infrastructure that you're immune to our global geopolitical whimsy.  Your fate has already been decided, and when we steal this election away from Trump you'll sit and take it.  We will have, by that time, promoted such an even greater divisive message through our controlled media, that very few will have the stomach to stand and oppose it. You'll take what we shove down your throats and like it." 

Our elitist friend takes another drag of his cigarette.  His last comment was followed up with what I would call, a half baked laugh.  I really don't like this guy, but he's like a train wreck.  I simply have to hear him out.  These past eight months have taught me a lot, thanks to Mr. Trump. He's helped me fill in missing puzzle pieces. To hear one of the architects of this diabolical plan actually say it... I continued to remain quiet.  I continued to hear him out as he continues to brag about the atrocities which he and his global elitist friends have committed.   

"Try and think of the establishment as the judicial branch of
a global elite Monarchy."
"We globalists have done all of this – we’ve bankrupted countries, siphoned wealth, stolen elections and have set up our own tower of Babel, and we sure as hell aren’t going to let a glorified real estate agent / contractor, come in and take it."  

"We play God because we must. It's obvious why Trump chooses to challenge us via political correctness.  Control the language control the people.  Political correctness reigns and so do we.  Trumps and his supporters attack political correctness, just as the Nationalists do in Great Britain, but they will continue to fall on the sword of political correctness via our bought and paid for media. They will be labeled the same way in which we labeled Tea Baggers!  Today the term Tea Partier is synonymous with white racists.  We did that!  We're doing it again.  Every time you call us "the establishment" we place you at odds with one another.  You can not win. We strip the language from the left and from the right, handing it from one to the other when it suits us.  We have the media machine in order to do it." 


At this point I'm becoming bored with our friends rant.  Our elitist  friend has been working himself into a rage.  His voice has gradually increased in vibrato, and he's kicked up his volume several notches. I let him continue just a little longer.

"The age of men standing up to tyranny is over, we have broken the back of Americans by banking on their own hypocrisy when it comes to the scraps we allow them to feed from.   When push comes to shove the average American citizen, will be unwilling to make a stand against us, because at that point they'll be too busy fighting with one another.  Indeed, not only that, but you simply do not have the stomach for it.  John Q American is not going to risk the little piece of the world we've allowed him to keep.  He'll hold onto it for dear life, all the way up to the point where we walk up to him and take his guns and then the keys to his house.  He'll then just disappear into the landscape."



There's a knock on the door behind him.  He's not expecting anyone. Now it's my turn to smile.  

I end this somewhat fictional piece with a question to you the reader.  To you my fellow American. Who is on the other side of that door and what will become of the global elitist and his fellows?  You see, I happen to be of the humble belief that the United States of America is no ones patsy, and that we have one last shot in this election, to change the direction our country is headed, down a path that this pseudo-imaginary figure would bestow upon us given the opportunity to do so. Who's that knocking at the door? Is it you who reads this, knocking upon his door? Is it you on the other side of the door?  If so, I say we tar and feather this mother fucker, how about you?  You don't have to like Donald J. Trump. Like has got nothing to do with it.  Like was a luxury that perhaps your great, great grandparents had during election. Perhaps not.  


Regardless, it's of no consequence now.  It's time my fellow Americans to unite.  Not divide. It's time to thwart the common enemy.  If you cut off the establishment the elites lose tremendous power and are only left with a three legged stool.  We can not be fools and elect establishment politicians like CRUZe, Kasich, or Hillary, and we certainly don't need to throw the baby out with the bath water with socialism, especially when we've proven that our Republic can thrive under capitalism and a free democracy.  Like him or not, he's the right medicine. You may not like the taste of penicillin, but if you've got an infection in your body, you'd be wise to take it. Vote Trump.  Get the word out.  


As for me? I'd like to think that there are patriots on the other side of that door, with fife and drum. I hear them knocking.  Let them in. 



  

  

Monday, March 14, 2016

Control the language. Control the electorate. Control Donald Trump?

"If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun."  

Yep he said that.

Who?  


Barrack Obama 


Barrack Obama also said prior to the 2008 election, 
"...I want you to argue with [your friends and neighbors], I want you to get in their face."  
HYPOCRISY ALERT:  WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE WILL KILL THE GANDER!


In Jem Berkes, 2000 critique of George Orwell's 1984, Berkes writes,

"...like many other literary scholars, is [Orwell] interested in the modern use of the English language and, in particular, the abuse and misuse of English. He realizes that language has the power in politics to mask the truth and mislead the public, and he wishes to increase public awareness of this power. He accomplishes this by placing a great focus on Newspeak and the media in his novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Demonstrating the repeated abuse of language by the government and by the media in his novel, Orwell shows how language can be used politically to deceive and manipulate people, leading to a society in which the people unquestioningly obey their government and mindlessly accept all propaganda as reality. Language becomes a mind-control tool, with the ultimate goal being the destruction of will and imagination. As John Wain says in his essay, “[Orwell’s] vision of 1984 does not include extinction weapons . . . He is not interested in extinction weapons because, fundamentally, they do not frighten him as much as spiritual ones”  


Case in point is being demonstrated in the 2016 Presidential race.  It's OK for Obama to use such rhetoric during an election to intimidate and disrupt, while Trump never asked for these protesters to attend in the first place. They alone are responsible for their actions. Anyone see the irony there? Today however, the news is not so much about how the usual suspects control the language, rather how one candidate in particular has shinned more light upon this than any other, Donald J. Trump.  In fact many would say he has done so with innate accuracy within the acumen.   The use of language to control entire society's, dates back to Aristotle and beyond.  
"The ultimate tool of control."  M. Ashraf Bhat PhD
So there is nothing surprising here when anti-Trump supporters crash peaceful Trump rallies to thwart free speech.  Yeah, no irony there. The usual suspects controlling the political narrative are the left and right wing of the same bird.  When you realize that, things not only get put into perspective, but everything becomes simplified. The left wing demeans, ridicules, name calls and slanders, while the right wing calls foul, (or should I say fowl) and falls under the weight of the left wings disparaging language.  (They can always be counted on to back down)  The left wing shouts words like, "racists, homophobes, Nazi, misogynists, uneducated, cruel!"  While the right wing exclaims, 'uh... no we're not!  Uh...let us explain!"  My oh my how the passive aggressive child in the dysfunctional relationship has his or her own kind of special power. Both wings of the same bird have played a role in American politics for more than two decades, and their arrangement has been symbiotic to say the least, each benefiting the other by controlling the interests of the donor class.  This would explain why those who have sought to control it are willing to do anything or say anything in order to regain possession of the language.  But who has stolen it from them?  Trump.  Trump relentlessly shines a mirror in their faces, and the reaction is rich in the face of the type of human amoeba which dwells upon the bottom rung of Maslows Hierarchy in terms of emotional and mental development.  You want to piss off an emotionally immature cretin?  Hand them a mirror.  Their own self loathing is fire to the gasoline, and all Trump has done is light the proverbial match.  "Feel THAT Bern?" Bern baby Bern!


On The Left
  • Black Lives Matter
  • MoveOn.org
  • Occupy Wallstreet (Soros)
  • Bill Ayers
  • Rachel Maddow
  • MSNBC (to name a few)



On The Right
  • Megyn Kelly
  • Rupert Murdoch
  • Bill O'Reilly
  • Rush Limbaugh
  • Mitt Romney
  • Fox News to name a few




When you realize that the right wing and the left wing are attached to the same bird you realize that Laura Ingraham got it right when she said, (I'm paraphrasing)

"The establishment is not afraid Trump can't beat Hillary. The establishment is afraid that he can." 


What the complicit media fails to understand (or at a minimum fails to report) is that Trump supporters fall under two categories, when it comes to Mr. Trumps language. 

  1. The we want him Louder group and the
  2. "OK that was loud, and uh... it's not "Presidential" but thank God" group. 
Both schools of Trump are highly educated folks.  They have taken political correctness beatings for decades. They have been told which side of the isle they're supposed to stand on for decades despite the fact that in reality they're a little bit of both. They've been told however, that if they believe this or if they believe that, then they belong here or they belong there. They have taken hit after hit from both wings of a bird whose agenda is clearly not in the best interest of its people.  The ramifications of this polarizing agenda is mentioned at every single one of Trumps rally's, exposing the corruption for what it is.  Trump is basically shinning light on the vampires, and what you hear are their screams as they watch everything they've worked for, (or in the case of the Bernie supports - not worked for) die.   Both schools of Trumps rhetoric, realize the inter-relationship between those who dish it out and those who take it, through happenstance themselves are complicit in this group think by having their voices stripped from them.  Hence, a popular unofficial theme song at Trump rallies is by one of the Twisted Sisters in this dysfuncitional familial relationship,  "We're not going to take it" anymore.  

Donald J. Trump is like sunlight to vampires, and the reaction you see already from the leftist organizations disrupting Trump rally's, by performing an assist to their friends on the right, a mere shot over the bow, as an attempt to reinstate the power of the peoples voice with the establishment who controls it.  It's merely an attempt to silence the voice of "We The People."  For the first time the adults in the room have said to the spoiled little children and their enablers, "ya know what?  No.  You can't have a cookie before your dinner."  

Millennial 
It's time to wash the bugs out of your hair, and take a bath.  It's time to produce.  If you're here illegally you have to go.  "We either have a country or we don't."  

Winning is OK.  It's OK to win. Participation trophy's are stupid.  It's not OK to kill babies Carte Blanche, but women's health issues are important.  We're not stupid enough to think that one minus the other negates the other.  Only you're stupid enough to suggest it. 

I digress.  Where was I.  Oh yeah.  Donald Trump gave American's their voice back.  Oddly enough, those American's who support him are not all identifying themselves as "Conservative or Democrat."  Those who still attempt to control the language however, quite shockingly continue to do so on the cable networks.  

"Trump is swaying blue collar democrats"  "Trump is swaying independents."  "Trump has 68% of the Latino vote in Florida!"  "Trump is winning with Evangelicals."  
No.  Trump is winning with Americans.  
Still the left wing and the right wing converge.  No more evident than in the reporting from our friends at The Conservative Treehouse, (shout out to a group of great Americans) who recently reported on the members of both parties who met behind closed doors in Sea Island Georgia the other day.  


"The odds of so many far-left members of the elite billionaire class meeting with Karl Rove inc. for anything less than a strategy session would be obtuse in the extreme.

[…] Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google co-founder Larry Page, Napster creator and Facebook investor Sean Parker, and Tesla Motors and SpaceX honcho Elon Musk all attended. So did Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), political guru Karl Rove, House Speaker Paul Ryan, GOP Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.), Cory Gardner (Colo.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Rob Portman (Ohio) and Ben Sasse (Neb.), who recently made news by saying he “cannot support Donald Trump.” 
Along with Ryan, the House was represented by Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (Mich.), Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas) and almost-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), sources said, along with leadership figure Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-Ga.), Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (Texas) and Diane Black (Tenn.).
Philip Anschutz, the billionaire GOP donor whose company owns a stake in Sea Island, was also there, along with Democratic Rep. John Delaney, who represents Maryland. Arthur Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times, was there, too, a Times spokeswoman confirmed. (link)"
"It’s a short connection to the events last night in Chicago where the MoveOn group and all the affiliated enterprises joined together with the Never Trump campaign.  This admission simply puts both sides of the UniParty in alignment with professional agents who can fulfill the objectives. (You can read more of the article here)"
So we've established that there are indeed two wings of the same bird embraced in a symbiotic relationship that has less than benefited the many people many of them have sworn to represent, instead, faced with a Trump candidacy gone Presidential, they writhe in pain from the sunlight, the vampires who suck our blood.  The vampires who are sucking the life out of our Republic, refuse to go quietly, and so we have... the noise at the Trump Rally's, compiled with the noise on the cable networks and their talking puppets.  Ted CRUZe was right about one thing.  If we're going to beat them, we have to do it at the ballot box.  1237.  That's all we need folks to silence them without further interruption.  
"The left and right wing belong to the same bird."
My youngest daughter attended Ohio University, and one of her business classes was taught by a retired adjunct professor / business man who at one time worked for Donald Trump.  She took the class a couple of years ago, and remembers to this day how the man talked of Mr. Trump as a good man, a decent man. A savvy businessman who held his employees accountable. I mention this because, have you noticed that with all of this negative ad campaigns and attempts to bring Trump down, that they've not been able to get one disgruntled employee to say a bad thing about the man?  Not one?  Surely by now they'd have them lined up in front of the cameras, but yet... not one.  Hell, even Geraldo can't say anything bad about his character.  He cries and complains about illegal Mexicans having the "right" to remain in the country illegally, but he stops short of criticizing the man. That's because he can't folks.  He simply can't. The only ones ridiculing him are professional politicians and financially backed media sources who don't know him. The only ones fueling the ridicule are the globalist establishment and they're at their wits end.  
So now, I'm going to take a page off the playbook of Mr. Trump, and I'm going to do my part in taking my country back.  I'm going to make some noise.  I'm going to begin with Lyin' Ted CRUZe.  
Lyin' Ted CRUZe
OK Cruz fans, you might want to turn away from your computer right now.  Shit's about to get real.  I am going to indict Mr. Cruz as an establishment candidate.  I am going to offer facts.  To be fair I'm going to go on record and state that many of these facts are somewhat circumstantial in nature and would not hold up in a court of law on their individual merit alone, however, I believe when you hear all of these facts combined, you will find it logically impossible to question these instances, not only by his mere associations, but by his deeds within' those associations. It's the compilation of the facts that indict Ted to the reasonably logical mind.  
  1. Ted said recently, of the Trump rally protesters, that "Trump is to blame."  Ted the "Constitutionalist" not only seems to forget about the 1st amendment rights of those gathering peacefully at the rally, but by making the statement that Trump is to blame for the actions of the protesters, he aligns himself with the following establishment cretins and minions; Megyn Kelly, Rachel Maddow, MoveOn.Org, Black Lives Matter, F**k The Police, Occupy Wall Street and professional Anarchists.  Granted for political gain.  That justify's it right Cruzbots? It's OK to align yourself with them, but it wasn't OK for Trump to line the pockets of politicians on both sides of the isle to call in favors as a businessman.  Some might call what Trump did in that regard participation in being extorted by those politicians, but what's Ted's excuse? 
  2. By calling Trump supporters "low information" and "not engaged," he's aligning himself with the before mentioned establishment purveyors. (Hang in there, it gets better. I promise, I'm leading with the low lying fruit)
  3. As vice chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Ted conspired with Mitch McConnell and the rest of the establishment, to overturn the will of the people in Mississippi, to railroad movement candidate Chris McDaniel, for establishment incumbent pick Thad Cochran.  The committee held a run off vote, after which ran negative race baited campaign ads to overturn the election in Mississippi and thus award the election to Cochran.  Ironically the same dirty politics being batted about as an option in the current Presidential race.  And who will be their poster child should the establishment try and contest and or broker the convention should Trump get the most votes but fall short of the 1237?  You guessed it.  According to (I can't keep my big mouth shut Lindsey Graham) "we might have to vote for Cruz if Trump gets the most votes." Cruz is obviously trying to distance himself from this.  You can read about that here.  Once Lindsey let the cat out of the bag however, MSNBC has made it somewhat a mantra.  "The Republican's might have to hold their nose and vote for Ted CRUZe."  Really?  
Wait...How can this be?  Rush Limbaugh INSISTS that Cruz is NOT establishment, and he's a real entertainer! Rush would never steer anyone wrong!  For the love of God, if Rush is one of them we're all screwed!  Rush is an entertainer. He blends fact with fiction.  I've been listening to the man for 25 years. I enjoy his program, and he says a lot of good things.  Believe it or not, he dishes out a lot of bullshit too. Yeah.  Hate to break that one to you. You better stop reading this article now.  It's one thing to go after Ted, but Rush?  My God man!  How will you have a thought of your own if Rush doesn't feed it to you first!  In fact, of all the areas the left and the right disagree on, the one thing they DO agree on is that Ted is NOT establishment and that Trump is not to be President.  I'm sorry... does anybody else find that bizarre?  They ALL agree?  When I say they, I mean people whom you normally wouldn't associate ever agreeing, like...
  • Rachel Maddow and Rush Limbaugh.  
  • Megyn Kelly and Chris Matthews 
  • Hannity and Geraldo
  • Krauthammer and Whoopie
  • Dogs making love to cats
  • The cheetah comingling with the gazelle!  (in the biblical sense)

Sorry... I had a moment there.  The point is, that EVERYONE is saying CRUZe is not establishment in an environment where the only other place they can agree is that Trump has to go!  Anyone?  Nothing?  Really?  Yeah... you're right.  Mere coincidence. What was I thinking?  They agree on it because it's true... yeah... that's it.  I'd best proceed. 

    4. After the "assist" in Mississippi, a year later Ted was shocked to find that Mitch McConnell was a liar on TPP deal.  I know, "oh God not this again!"   Wait... he just helped him lie in Mississippi to thwart another movement candidate from being elected and then CRUZe trusTED McConnell?  Well... refresh my memory.  If you're a globalist and your wife works for Goldman Sachs, how exactly is it you avoided conflict of interest and passed TPP at the "arm twisting" by McConnell?  Oh wait you didn't.  You just called McConnell a liar after the fact.  Yep.  For your "low information voter" I'm sure that's plenty. Nothing to see here folks!  Move along!  Moving on, just another coincidence, that's all.  I'll get to Heidi in a moment.    
    5. Now let's look at who Mr. Constitution did NOT receive endorsements from.  Certainly there's some questionable information we can glean from those who once supported him but no longer do.  Sarah Palin for example.  (Yeah... we know... SNL has ruined all credibility.  Afterall, SNL is the conscience of all Americans right?)  Humor me on this one though.  At one time you exalted her and now SHE is the traitor?  Gee... with friends like you....  CRUZe credits her with helping him get elected in Texas.  Safe to say that by not endorsing him, he disappointed her.  But how?  Have you ever thought to ask?  How about Senator Sessions?  Perhaps this video helps to SPLAIN why Senator Sessions supports Donald Trump and NOT CRUZe.   

      6.  Heidi CRUZe pulling an assist on the Council on Foreign Relations, building a "North American community with the globalists?  You all realize this is the big reason the left           and right oppose Trump.  He's the only Nationalist on the ticket on either side of the               isle. 

      7.  Having mentioned all of that, who's taking money from the donors?  Who is making financial pleas for money to the Koch Brothers on National TV?  CRUZe.  (Chris Matthews was quick to jump on that one.  He actually got a thrill down his leg again.     

What about conservative icon Phyllis Schafly?  Ben Carson? The list goes on. The bottom line here is this.  Anyone one of the before mentioned arguments standing alone can make you go hmmm... but compiled together?  Even if it does not convict him in your mind, it certainly places enough doubt to admit he's truly a gamble.  HE is the risky candidate, NOT Trump. Every time shots are fired at the crime scene Ted is there, and yet he gets a pass.  His prints weren't on the gun.  Notice how I left out the part about him being a Canadian, even though the democrats will bring it up if it's not vetted, but I think that's enough, if you're reasonable that is. Far too many connections and inter-relationships whereby the American people were betrayed by Ted.  It's why we misTRUST Ted.  Too many at the wrong place at the wrong time scenarios.  Too many times he aligns himself with the establishment when it serves him. Too many coincidences.  Too much to just roll the dice and give him a pass when the stakes are this high. 

It is also why Trump supporters will not vote for anyone other than Trump.  Why?  We know CRUZe to be establishment.  The establishment is the bird.  The left wing and the right wing belong to the same bird.  That being the case, a vote for CRUZe is like a vote for Hillary.  The result remains the same.  The globalist agenda proceeds and they get precisely what they want.  Trump is the only Nationalist in the election on either side of the isle.  He's the only one they can not control.  They have asked him repeatedly to be a good boy and do as he's told, and he's doubled down on NO every time.  Instead?  He calls them out on it.  Ever so not so subtly. Pure genius.  OK - enough on CRUZe. 
Now let's talk Karate Chop John Kasich.  Let me caveat this with, I live in Ohio.  This article does a far better job than I at detailing the reasons Kasich has been horrible for Ohio and would be horrible in Washington.  He'll never get the nod, and everyone knows it.  He's keeping in step with the agenda of the people who own him.  His donors.  He is fiscally irresponsible but gets away with it because as Trump pointed out, he struck oil, but as you're reading this Ohio is going broke.  John has done like most, he's passed the buck.  He won't be around for the ramifications of his actions, instead he'll do like the rest in Washington, and leave the mess for our children and grand children. I'll outline some of the major talking points of the article. First... the man is a spendaholic! 

"Ohio’s current ranking is a dismal 38Th in job creation, so while you fought against ending forced union dues payments, right to work states dominated job growth across the country." If you want to know the real John Kasich I refer you back to the early debates, where John spat all over himself going after Trump in a series of Karate chops, you'll recall a guy that was a totally different person than he demonstrates to be now.  Today we see sensitive John, the John talking to people in "Town Hall" meetings, where he hugs and embraces people who are crying.  Hey John!  We're crying here in Ohio!  Hug us!  Alas we wait for the hug. 
  1. Increasing taxes or ignoring tax cuts
  2. Crony corporate favors with tax payer money
  3. Long standing defense of Common Core in Education
  4. Marriage to private sector unions and big labor to the detriment of jobs
  5. Spendaholic
  6. The advancement of Obamacare in implementation and support 
What makes the list of policy disasters above even more intolerable to so many Ohio Republicans and conservatives is that Kasich ran for Governor as someone else. He looked us in the eye, often one on one, and promised to be different than the Democrats, but we got just the opposite – more spending, more government dependents and the same union protection we get with Democrats"


That's right governor "you advanced Obamacare in Ohio, turning over 600,000 healthy, working age adults into government dependents, costing taxpayers billions of dollars and expanding the largest long term obligation in Ohio history – all against the will of the Republican controlled Ohio House and Senate.

 Given that these 600,000 Ohioans would not be government dependents had you not bypassed the legislature and vetoed their wishes so you could accept Obamacare funding and conditions – how can you say you oppose Obamacare while unilaterally championing its single biggest component?" I think that's enough on Kasich.  John Kasich?  Ninja please! 
Bottom line here folks.  Kasich is mathematically out of this race.  So why is he staying in it?  I would direct your attention to our friends at the treehouse on that one again.  They called this delegate / splitter strategy prior to the election!  Sundance totally pegged it.  (hat tip #2)

Now let's talk about Marco Rubio.  Ready?  

Little Marco
There.  Covered.  Enough said about little Marco.  He's done he's out he's... gone?  He only suspended his election.  Gee... doens't that mean he can "give" his electoral votes to someone at the convention?  Oh my.... Oh my... 1237 folks.  1237.  It's in your hands. 

This takes me back to Trump. "They" say "he stoops to name calling." "He goes on the offensive and offends people in the process!"   "He doubles down on his loud and obnoxious rhetoric!"  "Trump has really polarized the American political landscape."  Yeah that's right.  Not Obama.  Obama hasn't polarized or divided the country at all! Noooo...  "It's that Trump guy!  It's not the mainstream media on the left and the right!"  Trump and Trump alone should scare Americans back into their homes where they can live in fear.
When you pull back the curtain, as Trump has done, you expose them all.  You see the reality is the protesters at the Trump rallies are the same idiots responsible for burning down entire city blocks, disrupting commerce, and not contributing to society but rather taking from it.  They are the true dividers by their very nature, because they are bought by people like Soros and Ayers.  No hypocrisy there right?   

Well we want our country back.  We want it to be "great again."  We want our voice back.  We not only want to take back control of the language from those whom use it to force an agenda backed by globalists hell bent on destroying us, and who have no intention on paying back a debt to our children and grand children.  They rather we implode.  We rather they not get their way.  There's only one candidate who is self-funding his own campaign, and therefore there is only one candidate that is a threat to the way in which "business as usual" exists in Washington and abroad.  Saudi's are making $1 billion dollars per day.  Countries like China are devaluing their dollar to abuse the United States economy like a red headed step child.  So am I upset when Trump says something others deem inappropriate?  Trump supporters, unlike any other Presidential candidate supporter realize everyone else is part of the establishment.   If they take Trump out of the equation it's over.  There is no "vote for this guy because he's not Hillary," or "vote for that guy because he's the least of two evils."  The left wing and the right wing belong to the same bird.  When you admit this to be FACT, then your vote is Trump, whether you like him "personally" or not.